New research challenges FTC’s pharmaceutical merger remedy policy
Research Brief
Haas News
Responding to concerns about an increasingly electronic stock exchange, Finance Professor Terry Hendershott studied algorithmic trading and found that computer-driven trading based on algorithmic formulas does, in fact, improve the market’s liquidity. Furthermore, this kind of high speed trading allows stock prices to become more “efficient” or reflective of true supply and demand in the market.
Hendershott’s research summarizes these key findings:
The research data showed no evidence that algorithmic trading causes instability or volatility in prices. Hendershott spent two years gathering data at the New York Stock Exchange. In 2003, the exchange implemented a change in trading practices, speeding up how fast data was delivered to market participants. The upgrade and increased algorithmic trading were introduced across stocks over time, allowing later affected stocks to act as the research’s control group.
Paper: Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity?
Co-authors: Charles M. Jones, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University and Albert J. Menkveld, VU University Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute
Forthcoming in the Journal of Finance
Responding to concerns about an increasingly electronic stock exchange, Finance Professor Terry Hendershott studied algorithmic trading and found that computer-driven trading based on algorithmic formulas does, in fact, improve the market’s liquidity. Furthermore, this kind of high speed trading allows stock prices to become more “efficient” or reflective of true supply and demand in the market.
Posted in: